MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046548806 · doi:10.1055/s-2001-16616

Autosomal Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay in Two Unrelated Turkish Families

2001· article· en· W2046548806 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K. Gücüyener, Caroline Paternotte, J Prudhomme, Meral Özgüç, Haluk Topaloğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropediatrics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSpasticityAtaxiaCerebellar ataxiaSpasticAtrophyLocus (genetics)DysarthriaHereditary spastic paraplegiaPediatricsPathologyGeneticsAudiologyBiologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCerebral palsyPsychiatryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay is an early onset form of hereditary spastic paraplegia with a peculiar clinical presentation. In addition to cerebellar findings which manifest first with ataxic gait in early life and spasticity, on an evolutionary basis, there is axonal neuropathy, prominent myelinated fibers in the optic fundus, and evidence of cerebellar atrophy that can be detected by cranial MRI. Intelligence is usually normal, however lower IQs have also been documented. This disorder mainly originates from the Charlevoix-Saguenay region of Quebec. Here, we report two Turkish families linked to the disease locus on chromosome 13 q12. There was homozygosity and segregation of disease haplotypes in both families. This form of spastic ataxia may be more common than originally presumed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropediatricsSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207