MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046568673 · doi:10.1115/imece2013-63294

Using Pyramidal Three-Roll Bending Process to Improve the Quality of Seamed Cylinders

2013· article· en· W2046568673 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Forming Simulation Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBent molecular geometryWeldingBendingCylinderProcess (computing)Structural engineeringPlanarMechanical engineeringComputer simulationComputer scienceSoftwareMaterials scienceEngineeringSimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mecano-welding can efficiently produce cylinders used in various industries. The pyramidal three-roll bending process is commonly used to produce a cylinder with non-seamed gap. However, there is a planar zone near the front and rear ends. This planar zone can be seamed with a welding process. In this paper, a numerical model is proposed to simulate the roll bending process and the welding process so that the geometrical quality of the bent cylinders can be improved. Explicit and implicit solvers are applied to the numerical modeling by using ANSYS/LS-DYNA software. The numerical model can provide a useful tool for design and optimization of the Mecano-welding process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it