MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046576053 · doi:10.1243/0954405042418419

Three-dimensional elastoplastic finite element model for residual stresses in the shot peening process

2004· article· en· W2046576053 on OpenAlex
M.S. ElTobgy, Nalini Singhal, M.A. Elbestawi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSurface Treatment and Residual Stress
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShot peeningResidual stressMaterials sciencePeeningFinite element methodShot (pellet)Structural engineeringWork hardeningMechanicsComposite materialMetallurgyEngineeringPhysicsMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fatigue life of mechanical components subjected to variable loading conditions is a crucial parameter in the design of automotive and aerospace mechanical components. The fatigue strength of the component can be improved by inducing compressive residual stress in the surface and subsurface layers by the shot peening process. This increases the failure strain magnitude for crack nucleation and propagation. Extensive experimental results have been published on the effect of shot peening process parameters on residual stress distributions and subsequently on fatigue performance. Numerical simulation of residual stres induced by the shot peening process is important for understanding and optimization of the process in terms of the residual stress profile and maximum shot coverage in the shortest time. In this paper, an elastoplastic finite element (FE) model will be presented to simulate the shot peening process in three-dimensional configuration. The FE model takes into account numerical and material damping, thermal elastic—plastic material behaviour, a rigid or deformable body for the shot and the effects of multiple shot impacts. The workpiece material modelled was AISI 4340 steel at HRC 52 ± 2. The effects of strain hardening, strain rate and temperature were considered in the non-linear material model. Results show that the predicted residual stress profile agreed well with that acquired from published experimental results provided the shot was modelled as a deformable body and material damping was considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it