MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Macroscopic and Microscopic Analysis of the Palato-Gingival Groove

2000· article· en· W2046582613 on OpenAlexaff
Vanessa Soares Lara, Alberto Consolaro, Robert W. Bruce

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endodontics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroove (engineering)DentistryCoronal planeMaterials sciencePeriodontiumEnamel paintDentinPulp (tooth)IncisorOrthodonticsMedicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the objective of correlating the anatomical aspects of the palato-gingival groove with its etiology, diagnosis, and alternative treatments, 13 permanent maxillary incisors with palato-gingival grooves were selected from a large sample and subjected to macroscopic and microscopic analysis of groove morphology. The palato-gingival groove occurred most frequently on the lingual aspect of the lateral incisor (11 of 13), and its coronal and radicular extensions were on the disto-lingual surface of the incisors (7 of 13 and 6 of 13, respectively). Deformation of the contour of the pulp cavity was noted subjacent to the groove (9 of 13), along with diminished enamel and dentin thickness (11 of 13 and 13 of 13, respectively) and an increase in cement (12 of 13). The groove was observed extending to the apical third in nine specimens, and a direct communication between the pulp and periodontium was observed in only one case. From these examinations it is concluded that the palato-gingival groove can be clinically diagnosed, preventing subsequent problems; however microscopic analysis of the affected tooth is necessary to allow precise evaluation of the groove’s extension and damage to the dental structure. With the objective of correlating the anatomical aspects of the palato-gingival groove with its etiology, diagnosis, and alternative treatments, 13 permanent maxillary incisors with palato-gingival grooves were selected from a large sample and subjected to macroscopic and microscopic analysis of groove morphology. The palato-gingival groove occurred most frequently on the lingual aspect of the lateral incisor (11 of 13), and its coronal and radicular extensions were on the disto-lingual surface of the incisors (7 of 13 and 6 of 13, respectively). Deformation of the contour of the pulp cavity was noted subjacent to the groove (9 of 13), along with diminished enamel and dentin thickness (11 of 13 and 13 of 13, respectively) and an increase in cement (12 of 13). The groove was observed extending to the apical third in nine specimens, and a direct communication between the pulp and periodontium was observed in only one case. From these examinations it is concluded that the palato-gingival groove can be clinically diagnosed, preventing subsequent problems; however microscopic analysis of the affected tooth is necessary to allow precise evaluation of the groove’s extension and damage to the dental structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EndodonticsSame topicPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207