MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046594020 · doi:10.5539/mas.v6n12p86

Analysis of Contact Stress between Cylindrical Roller and Outer Ring Raceway with Taper Error Using ANSYS

2012· article· en· W2046594020 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shichao Zhu, Jia Chenhui

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacewayAsymmetryStress (linguistics)Ring (chemistry)Structural engineeringMaterials scienceContact mechanicsFinite element methodMechanicsComposite materialEngineeringPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taking a cylindrical roller bearing as a research object, the contact stress between the cylindrical roller and the outer ring raceway with a taper error is studied by means of ANSYS in order to obtain the allowable value of the upper bound of the taper error. The results show that the given load corresponds to the suitable upper bound of the taper error of the outer ring raceway and with the increasing taper error, the contact stresses between the cylindrical roller and the outer ring raceway increase observably and the distribution of the contact stresses presents more complex asymmetry and nonuniformity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicGear and Bearing Dynamics AnalysisFrench-language works237,207