ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY AND PETROLOGY OF A LOWER JURASSIC (PLIENSBACHIAN) PETROLEUM SOURCE ROCK FROM AÏT MOUSSA, MIDDLE ATLAS, MOROCCO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Organic‐rich silty marls and limestones (Pliensbachian to earliest Toarcian) exposed at Aït Moussa in Boulemane Province are the only known example of an effective petroleum source rock in the Middle Atlas of Morocco. In this study, petrological and organic‐geochemical analyses (vitrinite reflectance measurements, Rock‐Eval pyrolysis, GC‐MS) were carried out in order to evaluate the maturity, quality and quantity of the organic matter (OM) and to investigate the depositional environment of these source rocks. Results indicate the presence of Type I/II kerogen which was deposited under marine conditions with an input of predominantly algal‐derived organic matter. The presence of woody particles indicates minor input of terrestrial material. Organic‐geochemical and biomarker analyses are consistent with deposition of carbonate‐rich sediments under oxygen‐depleted but not anoxic conditions. In terms of thermal maturity, the sediments have reached the oil window (0.5–0.6 %VRt) but not peak oil generation, although petroleum generation and migration are indicated by organic geochemical and microscopic evidence. Kinetic parameters derived from an investigation of petroleum generation characteristics show that the kerogen decomposes within a narrow temperature interval due to the fairly homogenous structure of the algal‐derived organic matter. The kinetic parameters together with vitrinite reflectance data were used to construct a ID model of the burial, thermal and maturation history of the Aït Moussa locality. The model suggested that deepest burial (approx. 3200 m) for the Pliensbachian succession took place in the Eocene (approx. 40 Ma). Two phases of hydrocarbon generation occurred, the first in the Late Jurassic/Early Cretaceous (approx. 150 Ma), and the second at the time of deepest burial (Eocene).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".