MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046638769 · doi:10.3917/eh.070.0092

Appropriating modernity: electricity in Mumbai's slums before the financial crisis of 2008

2013· article· fr· W2046638769 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEntreprises et histoire · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Governance and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S’approprier la modernité : l’électricité dans les bidonvilles de Mumbai (1991-2008) Des grandes réformes économiques de 1991 à la crise financière de 2008, l’Inde a vécu un important développement économique et urbain. Ce pays a eu besoin d’une croissance significative de son énergie, et en particulier de son électricité, étant donné que l’industrie et les classes possédantes ont augmenté leur consommation. Or il en a été de même pour les classes populaires, rurales comme urbaines, qui n’ont pas hésité à recourir au piratage massif de l’électricité, au point de ralentir sérieusement les investissements dans le secteur. Une loi votée en 2003, tout en instituant de nouvelles structures et une réglementation plus poussée dans l’industrie électrique, a cherché à diminuer cette pratique, mais en vain. Les entreprises ont bien pris diverses mesures, cependant elles n’ont guère donné plus de résultats. À partir du cas de Mumbai, nous chercherons à comprendre pourquoi la réglementation a été impuissante à limiter le vol d’énergie dans les bidonvilles 1 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it