MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046654666 · doi:10.1139/t04-070

Unsaturated flow in coarse porous media

2005· article· en· W2046654666 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeff Reinson, D. G. Fredlund, Gordon Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulic conductivityPorous mediumCapillary actionSoil waterGeotechnical engineeringInfiltration (HVAC)Permeability (electromagnetism)Water retention curveWater flowWater retentionWater contentVadose zoneSuctionGeologyMaterials sciencePorositySoil scienceEnvironmental scienceChemistryComposite materialThermodynamicsMembranePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design of effective capillary barrier systems requires a thorough understanding of the soil–water interactions that take place in both coarse- and fine-grained unsaturated soils. Experimental observations of water flow through coarse porous media are presented to gain greater understanding of the processes and mechanisms that contribute to the movement and retention of water in coarse-grained unsaturated soils. The use of pendular ring theory to describe how water is held within a porous material with relatively low volumetric water contents is explored. Experimental measurements of seepage velocity and volumetric water content were obtained for columns of 12 mm glass beads using digital videography to capture the movement of a dye tracer front at several infiltration rates. An estimated curve for hydraulic conductivity versus matric suction is shown and compared to a theoretical curve. The method is shown to provide a reasonable predictive tool.Key words: soil-water characteristic curve, hydraulic conductivity curve, water permeability function, capillary barrier, matric suction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207