MASSIVE PERIPAPILLARY SUBRETINAL NEOVASCULARIZATION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the course and outcome of three consecutive patients with massive peripapillary subretinal neovascularization secondary to ocular histoplasmosis syndrome managed with submacular surgery. METHODS: Three eyes of three consecutive patients with progressive and massive peripapillary subretinal neovascularization secondary to ocular histoplasmosis syndrome were treated with submacular surgery and followed up for a mean of 41 months (range, 11-59 months). The main outcomes were surgical complications, visual acuity, and subretinal membrane recurrence. RESULTS: Visual acuity improved in each patient from counting fingers, 20/25, and 20/400 preoperatively to 20/50, 20/20, and 20/20, respectively, at the last follow-up visit. With respect to complications, Patient 3 was found to have an operculated retinal tear approximately 1 month postoperatively, which was successfully treated with argon laser retinopexy. There were no cases of visually significant cataract, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, or recurrent choroidal neovascularization in any of the operated eyes during the period of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Submacular surgery proved safe and beneficial in this small series of young patients with massive peripapillary subretinal neovascularization secondary to ocular histoplasmosis syndrome and should be considered in this relatively uncommon clinical presentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it