MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046721311 · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.534

Stability Criterion for BAM Neural Networks of Neutral-Type with Interval Time-Varying Delays

2011· article· en· W2046721311 on OpenAlexaff
Guoquan Liu, Simon X. Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Engineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks Stability and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterval (graph theory)Control theory (sociology)Linear matrix inequalityMathematicsMATLABArtificial neural networkBidirectional associative memoryStability (learning theory)Exponential stabilityType (biology)Range (aeronautics)Discrete time and continuous timeApplied mathematicsNonlinear systemComputer scienceControl (management)Mathematical optimizationContent-addressable memoryEngineeringStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the asymptotic stability for bidirectional associative memory (BAM) neural networks of neutral-type with interval time-varying delays is investigated. The discrete delay is assumed to be time-varying and belong to a given interval, which means that the lower and upper bounds of interval time-varying delays are available. By employing the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional method and using the linear matrix inequality (LMI) technique, a new delay-range-dependent stability criterion is established in terms of LMI. In addition, the proposed LMI based results can be easily checked by LMI control toolbox in Matlab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia EngineeringSame topicNeural Networks Stability and SynchronizationFrench-language works237,207