Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'article s'intéresse à l'évolution des pratiques coutumières de la transmission du patrimoine dans le comté de Verchères entre 1870 et 1950. L'on remarque deux modèles familiaux coexistants dont l'esprit est tout à fait différent. Dans le premier, le père transmet son bien le plus tard possible, après son décès. Dans le second, le père cède son bien de son vivant, vers le moment où il souhaite prendre sa retraite. Ce dernier modèle va gagner sur l'autre. L'évolution tend vers un cycle familial qui se raccourcit, allant en quelque sorte vers l'exclusion des parents, puisque le successeur exigera d'eux qu'ils partent pour le village quand il prendra femme et achètera l'exploitation, alors que la cohabitation était autrefois d'usage. Le changement produira des tensions familiales importantes et des mécanismes facilitant la transition entre anciens et nouveaux usages se mettront en place, comme le montreront les données ethnographiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".