University of Saskatchewan Mounts Another Successful Business Plan Competition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After last year's inaugural contest, the Pharmasave-Rubicon Annual Innovation in Pharmacy Student Business Plan Competition was held Thursday, March 29, in Convocation Hall at the University of Saskatchewan. Judges and sponsors included Paul Melnyk from Pharmasave, Christopher Fedorowich from Rubicon Pharmacies LP, Conrad Amenta from Blueprint for Pharmacy National Coordinating Office, Rosemary Killeen from the Canadian Pharmacists Journal, Trista Gallant from Hergott Duval Stack Chartered Accountants, Myla Wollbaum from the Pharmacists' Association of Saskatchewan, Mark Thibeault from Value Invest/Value Drug Mart and Stephanie Yong from the Wilson Centre for Entrepreneurial Excellence. Leah Phillips also joined the judging panel as a past winner of the competition. The competition was very successful, with most sponsors committed to participating again in the future. Inspiration for the competition arose out of recognition that pharmacists may not be providing new clinically effective services because of a lack of the business skills required to implement them. The ultimate goal of pharmacists is to improve patient outcomes, but if the services required to do so are not financially sustainable, then pharmacists may not be providing the standard of professional practice that individual patients and the overall system deserve. This competition recognizes the challenges one will likely face when implementing a new professional service and encourages students to overcome these barriers, which will ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes and a greater sense of professional fulfillment. In the third-year Management in Pharmacy course at the University of Saskatchewan, students are instructed to develop a business plan that implements a new service into an existing practice. The course provides students with an introduction to managerial concepts, including management strategy and marketing and business planning. In addition to the basics, students became self-directed learners and further educated themselves about topics they felt were necessary to successfully complete their plan. The first-place HEATID team members (from left to right): Kyle Wray, Tyler Little, Brayden Leclair, James Nataraj, Kellie Towriss and Marc Legge, with CPJ editor-in-chief, Rosemary Killeen. Sixteen teams participated, competing for cash and other prizes donated by sponsors. Each team had a maximum of 10 minutes to present their plan, followed by a 5-minute question and answer session with the judges. The 9 judges then assessed each presentation on 6 criteria, including presentation skills and the plan's feasibility. Prizes were awarded to the top 3 teams, with first place going to the plan for Holistic Education, Awareness and Treatment of Infectious Disease (HEATID), second place going to AMETHYST – Adolescent Mental Health Services and third place to the Jae's Pharmacy team. Plan Summary: HEATID is a 3-year pilot program, which is an integrative approach to treating, managing and preventing infectious diseases in the Prince Albert Parkland Health Region and surrounding northern communities. HEATID is aligned with the HIV Provincial Strategy Team's goals to decrease the prevalence of HIV in Saskatchewan and improve overall population health in the immediate future. HEATID aims to integrate an Infectious Disease Pharmacist into the already established interdisciplinary team at the Prince Albert Sexual Health Clinic. The Competition continues next year, with the tentative date for presentations set for Thursday, March 28, 2013, in Saskatoon. For more information on the winning plan and/or the competition, please contact Jason Perepelkin at ac.ksasu@nikleperep.nosaj.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.267 | 0.060 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".