MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046765596 · doi:10.1139/p09-013

Fourier transform spectra of the ν<sub>16</sub>, 2ν<sub>16</sub>, and 2ν<sub>16</sub>–ν<sub>16</sub> bands of pyrrole taken with synchrotron radiationThis article is part of a Special Issue on Spectroscopy at the University of New Brunswick in honour of Colan Linton and Ron Lees.

2009· article· en· W2046765596 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
D. W. Tokaryk, J. A. Van Wijngaarden

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPhysicsOvertoneSpectral lineExcited stateInfraredHamiltonian (control theory)Overtone bandAtomic physicsFourier transformSynchrotronNuclear magnetic resonanceOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rotationally-resolved vibrational spectra of three bands related to the lowest frequency vibration of the five-membered heterocycle pyrrole (c-C4H4NH) have been recorded using infrared light from the Canadian Light Source synchrotron as the source. The N-H out-of-plane wagging fundamental band ν16 (474.6 cm–1) was recorded with 0.001 cm–1 resolution along with the first hot band 2ν16–ν16 (488.1 cm–1). Both are governed by c-type selection rules. The first overtone 2ν16 (962.7 cm–1) was recorded with 0.0013 cm–1 resolution and has a-type rotational structure. A total of 9103 lines were assigned and included in a simultaneous fit of all three bands. The band origins and excited state rotational parameters were well-determined using Watson’s S-reduced Hamiltonian, Ir representation as seen by the low rms error of the global fit: 0.000 172 cm–1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207