Diphenyl(dipyrazolyl)methane Complexes of Ni: Synthesis, Structural Characterization, and Chromotropism of NiBr<sub>2</sub> Derivatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction of NiBr2 with the bidentate ligand diphenyl(dipyrazolyl)methane (dpdpm) gives the pentacoordinated complexes [(dpdpm)Ni(mu-Br)Br]2 (1), [(dpdpm)NiBr2(H2O)] (2a), and [(dpdpm)NiBr(H2O)2]Br (2b), or the octahedral complexes [(dpdpm)NiBr(H2O)2(CH3CN)]Br (3), [(dpdpm)2NiBr2] (4), and [(dpdpm)2NiBr(H2O)]Br (5). All of these complexes are paramagnetic, both in the solid state and in solution, and have been characterized by spectroscopic (IR, NMR, and UV-vis-NIR) and X-ray diffraction studies. The unoccupied coordination site in the pentacoordinated compounds allows long-range interactions, in the solid state, between the Ni center and a Ph substituent of the dpdpm ligand. These weak interactions are replaced by Ni-solvent interactions, both in the solid state and in solution, facilitating the interconversion of these compounds under various reaction conditions and leading to interesting solvato-, vapo-, and thermochromic properties. UV-vis-NIR spectroscopy has been used to study these phenomena. Absorption spectra for the room-temperature methanol or acetonitrile solutions of the pentacoordinate or octahedral compounds show three main bands in the region of 350-1000 nm that represent spin-allowed (d-d) transitions from the ground state 3A2g to the excited states 3T2g, 3T1g(3F), and 3T1g(3P). A weak shoulder was also detected on the middle peak in most spectra (700-800 nm), representing the spin-forbidden 3A2g-->1Eg transition. On the other hand, the spectra of high-temperature CH2Cl2 or acetone solutions of all complexes show four main bands at ca. 490, 650-660, 860, and 1000 nm, in addition to a shoulder on the first or second band.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".