The Influence of Structural Ordering on Luminescence from Nitride- and Oxynitride-Passivated Silicon Nanoclusters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Luminescent silicon nanoclusters have been formed in silicon-rich silicon nitride and silicon-rich silicon oxynitride films grown using inductively coupled plasma chemical vapour deposition. The luminescent properties and electronic structure of the films have been investigated through ultraviolet-excited photoluminescence and synchrotron-based X-ray absorption spectroscopy experiments at the Si K- and L3,2-edges, respectively. In the silicon-rich silicon nitride films, luminescence in the visible was observed from quantum confinement effects and inter-bandgap defect levels while X-ray absorption spectroscopy indicates a structural reordering of the silicon nanoclusters and nitride host matrix with increased silicon nanocluster phase separation, occurring at lower annealing temperatures in more silicon-rich films. Luminescence from the silicon-rich silicon oxynitride films appeared to be defect-related and only the silicon oxide and nitride host matrices exhibited structural reordering when annealed, while there was no change in the structure of the silicon nanoclusters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".