The Three-Dimensional Evolution of the Large-Scale Structures in the Impinging Round Jet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The evolution of the large-scale structures in the impinging round jet were studied by measuring the fluctuating pressure on the impingement surface for nozzle-to-plate distances of 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 nozzle diameters. It is found that the large-scale vortex ring structures played a much more dominant role when the nozzle-to-plate spacing was 2.0 diameters than for either 3.0 or 4.0 diameters. The results for a nozzle-to-plate spacing of 3.0 nozzle diameters more closely resembles the spacing of 4.0 diameters. The convection velocity of the different azimuthal modes were deduced from radial cross-spectra measurements. It was found that the convection velocity of all the azimuthal modes were similar and the convection speed for the structures measured with the fluctuating pressure were independent of nozzle-to-plate distance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".