On the Countermeasures of Panjin Coastal Wetland Protection in Liaoning Province --- Reflections on Five-point-in-a-line Construction Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The five-point-in-a-line strategy is actually an important component of development strategy of the coastal economic zone in Liaoning Province or even in the whole northeast China. The early five-point-in-one-line strategy only involved five key development areas in five coastal cities of Liaoning province. Since the beginning of June in the year of 2006, the strategy, instead of the original five-point-in-one-line layout, has been expanded to all the coastal cities of Liaoning Province, namely, Dalian City (Changxing Island Harbor Industrial Zone, Huayuankou Industrial Park), Yingkou (Liaoning Coastal Industrial Base), Dandong (Dandong Industrial Park), Jinzhou city of the western Liaoning Gulf Economic Area (Xihai Industrial Zone), and Huludao city (Beigang Industrial Zone and Xingcheng Industrial Park), Panjin City (Ship Building and Repairing Industry Park). In this way, all coastal cities in Liaoning have been included in Liaoning coastal economic zone development strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".