Inflammatory bowel disease: Incidence, prevalence, and disease characteristics in Barbados, West Indies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be lower among people of African descent than Caucasians. However, incidence studies among the former are uncommon and are often limited by incomplete case ascertainment or uncertainty about the size of the "at-risk" population. METHODS: We report the incidence and prevalence of IBD among people of African ancestry in Barbados from island-wide disease surveillance over a 25-year period beginning January 1980. RESULTS: The annual incidence of IBD age standardized to the world population was 1.85 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-2.22) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and 0.70 per 100,000 person-years (0.51-0.95) for Crohn's disease (CD). These incidence rates increased to 2.09 and 0.76 when standardized to the US population. The UC incidence rate increased from 1.3 in 1980-1984 to 2.3 in 1995-1999, and decreased to 1.6 in 2000-2004. The CD incidence rate followed a similar trend, rising from 0.3 in 1980-1984 to 1.3 in 1990-1994 before decreasing to 0.6. IBD prevalence in December 2004 was 44.3 per 100,000 person-years (36.7-53.0) for UC and 16.7 per 100,000 person-years (12.2-22.4) for CD. In the island-nation of Barbados, with a population in 2000 of 270,000, we expect between 4.3 and 6.1 new cases of UC and between 1.5 and 2.6 new cases of CD each year. CONCLUSIONS: The reported rates are generally lower than reported for European and North American Caucasians, and are similar to The French West Indies--the only other IBD disease register in the Caribbean.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".