A hybrid genetic radial basis function network with fuzzy corrector for short term load forecasting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The short term load forecasting plays a critical role in power system operation and economics. The accuracy of short term load forecasting is very important since it affects generation scheduling and electricity prices, and hence an accurate short term load forecasting method should be used. This paper proposes a Genetic Algorithm optimized Radial Basis Function network (GA-RBF) with a fuzzy corrector for the problem of short term load forecasting. In order to demonstrate this system capability, the system has been compared with four well known techniques in the area of load forecasting. These techniques are the multi-layer feed forward neural network, the RBF network, the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference System and the genetic programming. The data used in this study is a real data of the Egyptian electrical network. The weather factors represented in the minimum and the maximum daily temperature have been included in this study. The GA-RBF with the fuzzy corrector has successfully forecasted the future load with high accuracy compared to that of the other load forecasting techniques included in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".