MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046845664 · doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-06-03950-x

Completeness of systems of complex exponentials and the Lambert 𝑊 functions

2006· article· lv· W2046845664 on OpenAlexafffund
André Boivin, Hualiang Zhong

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldEngineering
TopicSports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsCompleteness (order theory)Exponential functionLambert W functionAlgebra over a fieldCalculus (dental)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study some of the properties of the solution system { e i λ n t } \{e^{i\lambda _nt}\} of the delay-differential equation y ′ ( t ) = a y ( t − 1 ) y’(t) = ay(t-1) . We first establish some general results on the stability of the completeness of exponential systems in L 2 L^2 and then show that the solution system above is always complete, but is not an unconditional basis in L 2 ( − 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 ) L^2(-1/2,1/2) .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.009
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicSports Dynamics and BiomechanicsFrench-language works237,207