Dinuclear Five‐Coordinate Copper(II) Complexes with Chelating Diphosphonic Acid Ligands: Hydrothermal Synthesis, Structure, and Thermal Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The synthesis of two new diphosphonic acid ligands,[ethane‐1, 2‐diylbis(azanediyl)]bis[(4‐chlorophenyl)methylene]diphosphonic acid (L1P), [ethane‐1, 2‐diylbis(azanediyl)]bis[(4‐bromophenyl)methylene]diphosphonic acid (L2P), and their corresponding copper complexes, Cu2(L1P)2 (1) and Cu2(L2P)2 (2) are described herein. Complex 2 was structurally characterized with X‐ray single crystal diffraction. The structure of 2 consists of five‐coordinatecopper(II) ions with a distorted square pyramidal arrangement doubly bridged by OPO from phosphonate groups. The Cu–Cu distance is 4.7810(2) Å. The crystal packing is determined by interdinuclear hydrogen bonds, which lead to one‐dimensional chains. The results of thermogravimetric investigations (TG‐DTA), UV/Vis diffuse reflectance, infrared and (1H and 13C) NMR spectroscopy, as well as elemental analyses of compounds 1 and 2 are also presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".