Adhesion of a Micro Double Cantilever Beam Driven by Capillary Forces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Capillary forces present during the manufacturing and operation of microelectromechanical structures have been shown to cause collapse of these structures. Once collapsed these structures may permanently adhere together. In this paper we study the adhesion of a microstructure represented by a double cantilever beam (DCB); such adhesion is driven by both the capillary forces from a liquid droplet located between the DCB and the adhesion forces between the solids. The DCB is modeled using both a beam theory that accounts for geometrical nonlinearity and the linearized beam theory. This model rigorously couples DCB deformation, capillary forces, meniscus movement and adhesion, and reveals four dimensionless parameters that govern the adhesion problem. How changes in these parameters influence the capillary forces, the length of the contact zone, and the contact force is discussed in detail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it