MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Developing and Evaluating a Nursing Bag System for Home Care Nurses Using a Participatory Ergonomics Approach

2006· article· en· W2046891524 on OpenAlexaff
Elaine J. Lee, Maureen Haddock, Shicheng Yu, Chris Back, Annalee Yassi

Bibliographic record

VenueHome Healthcare Nurse · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicErgonomics and Human Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingIntervention (counseling)Citizen journalismParticipatory ergonomicsMedicineHuman factors and ergonomicsMedical emergencyPoison controlComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Home care nurses expressed physical discomfort and dissatisfaction associated with transporting supplies to and from their vehicles and clients' homes with their existing bags. This study used a participatory approach to design a nurse's bag and evaluated the level of satisfaction of home care nurses transporting supplies before and after a bag-system intervention. One nursing bag system was preferred by the majority of home care nurses above others tested, as well as previously used systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHome Healthcare NurseSame topicErgonomics and Human FactorsFrench-language works237,207