MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046896661 · doi:10.2118/152084-ms

Evaluation of Recovery Performance of Miscible Displacement and WAG Process in Tight Oil Formations

2012· article· en· W2046896661 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsPenn West Exploration (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringPermeability (electromagnetism)Tight oilRelative permeabilityHydraulic fracturingEnhanced oil recoveryDirectional drillingOil wellGeologyDrillingEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringOil shalePorosityMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent advances in well design and production techniques have brought considerable attention to exploitation of tight (low permeability, absolute permeability <1 mD) oil resources. Drilling of long horizontal wells and deployment of hydraulic fractures along these wells (multi-fractured horizontal wells) can substantially improve the primary production rates from such reservoirs. Nevertheless, the low effective permeability of these reservoirs to oil hinders the sustainability of favorable oil rates and at some point applying some EOR technique becomes inevitable. In the current study, CO2 miscible flooding and WAG process in a tight oil reservoir are investigated. Although several studies have investigated different aspects of the process in conventional oil plays, the design of an effective scheme in tight oil formations is more complex. These complexities are related to the proper design of the fractures (half-length, conductivity, orientation (transverse vs. longitudinal), etc.) and their relative placement along producers and injectors and the operational constraints on each well or segment of the well. In this work, we utilize an EOR scheme design where multi-fractured horizontal wells are used for both injection and production, and the hydraulic fracturing stages are staggered to delay breakthrough and improve sweep efficiency. For a set of defined parameters, compositional simulations are conducted to investigate the effect of the CO2 slug size, WAG ratio and cycle length on the recovery efficiency of the model. The recovery from the aforementioned EOR process is then compared with its corresponding base case in which the reservoir has gone through periods of primary and water-flooding stages. The results of this study show that the incremental oil recovery from WAG process in tight formation can reach as high as 20%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it