MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MORE ON MINIMAL ENTROPY–HELLINGER MARTINGALE MEASURE

2006· article· en· W2046939348 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Finance · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsPointwiseLocal martingaleMartingale (probability theory)Hellinger distanceDoob's martingale inequalityMartingale pricingApplied mathematicsEntropy (arrow of time)Mathematical economicsEconometricsMathematical analysisPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper extends our recent paper ( Choulli and Stricker 2005 ) to the case when the discounted stock price process may be unbounded and may have predictable jumps. In this very general context, we provide mild necessary conditions for the existence of the minimal entropy–Hellinger local martingale density and we give an explicit description of this extremal martingale density that can be determined by pointwise solution of equations in depending only on the local characteristics of the discounted price process S . The uniform integrability and other integrability properties are investigated for this extremal density, which lead to the conditions of the existence of the minimal entropy–Hellinger martingale measure. Finally, we illustrate the main results of the paper in the case of a discrete‐time market model, where the relationship of the obtained optimal martingale measure to a dynamic risk measure is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it