Structural Investigation of a Phosphorylation-Catalyzed, Isoaspartate-Free, Protein Succinimide: Crystallographic Structure of Post-Succinimide His15Asp Histidine-Containing Protein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aspartates and asparagines can spontaneously cyclize with neighboring main-chain amides to form succinimides. These succinimides hydrolyze to a mixture of isoaspartate and aspartate products. Phosphorylation of aspartates is a common mechanism of protein regulation and increases the propensity for succinimide formation. Although typically regarded as a form of protein damage, we hypothesize succinimides could represent an effective mechanism of phosphoaspartate autophosphatase activity, provided hydrolysis is limited to aspartate products. We previously reported the serendipitous creation of a protein, His15Asp histidine-containing protein (HPr), which undergoes phosphorylation-catalyzed formation of a succinimide whose hydrolysis is seemingly exclusive for aspartate formation. Here, through the high-resolution structure of postsuccinimide His15Asp HPr, we confirm the absence of isoaspartate residues and propose mechanisms for phosphorylation-catalyzed succinimide formation and its directed hydrolysis to aspartate. His15Asp HPr represents the first characterized protein example of an isoaspartate-free succinimide and lends credence to the hypothesis that intramolecular cyclization could represent a physiological mechanism of autophosphatase activity. Furthermore, this indicates that current strategies for succinimide evaluation, based on isoaspartate detection, underestimate the frequencies of these reactions. This is considerably significant for evaluation of protein stability and integrity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".