Invited Discussion: Pedicled Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From Surgery and Neurobiology, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, QEII Health Sciences Center–HI Site, Halifax, NS, Canada. Erratum: This Invited Discussion was originally intended to appear with Ang Zeng, Jun Xu, Xiaoqing Yan, Lei You, Hongyan Yang. Pedicled Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: An Alternative Method to Repair Groin and Scrotal Defects. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57:285-288. However, it was omitted. We regret this error. Received July 11, 2006 and accepted for publication July 19, 2006. Reprints: Steven F. Morris, MD, MSc, FRCSC, Anatomy and Neurobiology, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, QEII Health Sciences Center–HI Site, 1796 Summer St, Room 4443, Halifax, NS, Canada NS B3H 3A7. E-mail: [email protected].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".