MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047001889 · doi:10.2350/09-02-0614-cr.1

Combination of Cor Triatriatum Sinistrum and Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome in Meckel-Gruber Syndrome: A Case Report

2009· article· en· W2047001889 on OpenAlexaff
Mana Taweevisit, Jitsupa Treetipsatit, Patou Tantbírójn, Paul S. Thorner

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCor triatriatumHypoplastic left heart syndromePolydactylyAutopsyDysplasiaAnatomyVentricleCardiologyInternal medicineHeart diseaseLeft atrium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meckel-Gruber syndrome (MKS) is a fatal, autosomal recessive disorder characterized by malformation of central nervous system, particularly occipital encephalocele, bilateral renal dysplasia, and polydactyly. However, the clinical findings of this syndrome encompass various organ abnormalities as a result of genetic heterogeneity. The associated heart anomaly in MKS is inconstant. Its prevalence is rare and no striking or specific cardiac defects have been documented. We present a case of MKS with combined cor triatriatum sinistrum (left atrium divided into upper and lower compartment by a thin membrane) and hypoplastic left heart syndrome (underdeveloped mitral valve, left ventricle, and aorta) in a 33-week male fetus that was ultrasonographically detected and confirmed by autopsy. In addition to the cardiac defects, the patient was found to have postaxial polydactyly of 4 extremities, Dandy-Walker malformation, bilateral renal cystic dysplasia, and hepatic plate malformation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a combination of cor triatriatum sinistrum and hypoplastic left heart syndrome in MKS has been reported in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric and Developmental PathologySame topicGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesFrench-language works237,207