MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047026205 · doi:10.1002/ppp.513

Ground‐ice stratigraphy and formation at North Head, Tuktoyaktuk Coastlands, western Arctic Canada: a product of glacier–permafrost interactions

2005· article· en· W2047026205 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePermafrost and Periglacial Processes · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Resources CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaLeverhulme Trust
KeywordsGeologyPermafrostIce sheetDeglaciationGeomorphologyArctic ice packCryosphereIce streamAntarctic sea iceGlacier morphologyIce shelfSeabed gouging by iceArcticGlacial periodSea iceOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glacially deformed permafrost at North Head, in the Tuktoyaktuk Coastlands of western Arctic Canada, contains a complex ground‐ice stratigraphy that formed during the course of the last glacial–interglacial cycle. Two generations of ground ice are distinguished within a single stratigraphic sequence. Pre‐deformation ice has been glacially deformed or eroded beneath the cold‐based margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS) during Marine Isotope Stage 2. Such ice comprises (1) buried basal ice, (2) massive segregated ice and (3) ice clasts subglacially eroded from pre‐existing ground ice. In contrast, post‐deformation ice has not been glacially disturbed because it formed during or after deglaciation; it includes (4) dykes and sills of intrusive ice, (5) massive segregated‐intrusive ice, (6) ice wedges and composite wedges, (7) segregated ice and (8) pool ice. The superimposition of post‐deformation intrusive ice and massive segregated‐intrusive ice into permafrost containing pre‐deformation ground ice indicates that substantial quantities of overpressurized water were injected into ice‐marginal permafrost during or after deglaciation. The required external water source for the post‐deformation intrusive ice was probably overpressurized subpermafrost groundwater in front of the retreating margin of the LIS. Injection of this water into proglacial permafrost hydraulically fractured the permafrost and formed ice dykes, ice sills and massive segregated‐intrusive ice. A two‐stage model of massive‐ice development can be reconciled with known permafrost and glacial conditions in the ice‐marginal context of the Late Wisconsinan LIS. The model probably applies to some other glaciated terrains of the western Canadian Arctic. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it