MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047051390 · doi:10.5539/res.v7n1p29

Formation of Competitiveness of Future Teacher of Technology and Business

2014· article· en· W2047051390 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of European Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Teacher Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationProcess (computing)Realization (probability)Professional developmentEngineering ethicsBusinessPedagogySociologyMathematics educationPsychologyEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article shows a technique of formation of competitiveness of future teacher of technology and business on the basis of modifications of process of vocational (professional) training, education and self-development. The purpose of article is directed on development and research of efficiency of pedagogical conditions of formation of competitiveness of future teacher of technology and business. As the basis of article acts the theory of competitiveness, forming need of development and improvement of professional qualities of future teacher. In article are provided structural components and factors of readiness of future teacher of technology and business to the competitive relations, studied pedagogical conditions of their realization. This article is intended for future school and university teachers, researchers, heads of the educational organizations, dealing with issues of improvement of vocational training of teachers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of European StudiesSame topicEducational Methods and Teacher DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207