MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047062376 · doi:10.1177/154193121005401314

Predicting operator mental workload using a time-based algorithm

2010· article· en· W2047062376 on OpenAlexaff
Wenbi Wang, Brad Cain, Xiao Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkloadComputer scienceTask (project management)Milgram experimentAlgorithmOperator (biology)Context (archaeology)Distributed computingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existing workload algorithms based on the Multiple Resources Theory (MRT) provide an effective approach for diagnosing operator overload caused by interference among concurrent tasks, however, their ability to handle overload in single task conditions is limited. We argue a time-based algorithm, developed on the Information Processing (IP) model of workload (Hendy, Liao, & Milgram, 1997), provides a viable solution to address this limitation. In this study, we proposed a new algorithmic implementation of the IP model in the context of task network modeling. The new algorithm was implemented in a JAVA program and tested on an existing model of a Bakan vigilance task. The results obtained from the new algorithm demonstrated the feasibility of this solution. By integrating resource-based and time-based algorithms, analysts will be able to diagnose more accurately system performance breakdowns caused by operator overload.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingSame topicHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyFrench-language works237,207