MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047089648 · doi:10.1109/nabic.2014.6921896

Demonstrating the power of object-oriented genetic programming via the inference of graph models for complex networks

2014· article· en· W2047089648 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInferenceGenetic programmingGraphTheoretical computer scienceObject-oriented programmingProgramming languageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditionally, GP used a single tree-based representation which does not lend itself well to state-based programs or multiple behaviours. To alleviate this drawback, object-oriented GP (OOGP) introduced a means of evolving programs with multiple behaviours which could be easily extended to state-based programs. However, the production of programs which allowed embedded knowledge and produced readable code was still not easily addressed using the OOGP methodology. Exemplified through the evolution of graph models for complex networks, this paper demonstrates the benefits of a new approach to OOGP inspired by abstract classes and linear GP. Furthermore, the new approach to OOGP, named LinkableGP, facilitates the embedding of expert knowledge while also maintaining the benefits of OOGP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEvolutionary Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207