MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047095679 · doi:10.1063/1.3560463

Impact of static and dynamic stress on threshold voltage instability in high-k/metal gate n-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors

2011· article· en· W2047095679 on OpenAlexaff
Chih-Hao Dai, Ting‐Chang Chang, Ann‐Kuo Chu, Yuan-Jui Kuo, Wen-Hung Lo, Szu-Han Ho, Ching-En Chen, Jou-Miao Shih, Hua-Mao Chen, Bai-Shan Dai, Guangrui Xia, Osbert Cheng, Cheng Tung Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceThreshold voltageTransistorInstabilityNegative-bias temperature instabilityStress (linguistics)DielectricGate dielectricOptoelectronicsField-effect transistorCapacitanceHigh-κ dielectricTrappingSemiconductorCondensed matter physicsVoltageElectrical engineeringChemistryElectrodePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter investigates the impact of static and dynamic stress on threshold voltage (Vth) instability in ultrathin n-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors with hafnium-based gate stacks. Experimental results indicate Vth shift under dynamic stress is more serious than that under static stress due to charge trapping within the high-k dielectric. Capacitance-voltage techniques demonstrated that electron trapping under dynamic stress was located in the high-k dielectric near the source/drain overlap region rather than throughout the overall dielectric layer. This implies in real circuit operation, the phenomenon of electrons trapped in high-k near the source/drain overlap is the main issue affecting Vth instability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207