MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047105141 · doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.2005.252.01.06

Sedimentary evolution and depositional architecture of a lowstand sequence set: the Lower Cretaceous Mulichinco Formation, Neuquén Basin, Argentina

2005· article· en· W2047105141 on OpenAlexaff
Ernesto Schwarz, John Howell

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentary depositional environmentGeologyCretaceousPaleontologyStructural basinSequence (biology)Sedimentary rockArchitectureArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Valanginian-aged Mulichinco Formation was deposited in the Neuquén Basin (west-central Argentina) during and immediately after a major fall in sea level, partially triggered by a tectonic inversion pulse. The formation represents a lowstand wedge where excellent outcrops, together with refined biostratigraphic coverage, have permitted the detailed examination of contemporaneous non-marine and marine deposits. Fourteen facies associations were identified in the Mulichinco Formation. They represent accumulation in a variety of environments ranging from gravelly fluvial braidplains to outer-shelf marine settings. Distribution of depositional environments, together with the identification of key surfaces and stratal patterns, has resulted in the identification of early and late lowstand, transgressive and highstand systems tracts. Accordingly, the Mulichinco lowstand wedge comprises one third-order sequence that lasted about 2 Ma and represents a lowstand sequence set. The character of shoreline sedimentation was highly variable along strike within the Mulichinco depositional area and alluvial deposits were not developed within incised valleys. Tectonically derived topography, basin physiography and fault-controlled subsidence are interpreted to have been the main controls on the evolution of the Mulichinco lowstand wedge. The results of this study have important implications for understanding both the history of Neuquén Basin and illustrating the previously undocumented architectural complexity that may exist within lowstand wedges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207