Human chromosome banding specific for electron microscopy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electron microscopy (EM) provides much higher resolution than that obtained with light microscopy (LM). Until now, however, no chromosome banding procedure specifically adapted for EM was available. To produce an easy and reproducible banding method that would allow accurate chromosome identification, we investigated the applicability of an immunochemical method. BrdU-substituted chromosomal regions can be accurately visualized by applying a monoclonal antibody against BrdU, followed by a gold-tagged secondary antibody. Since BrdU is incorporated during the last part of the S-phase, regions of darkly stained G- and C-bands are substituted. A characteristic C-banding pattern is revealed, and the G-banding obtained is sharp and allows discrimination between subbands. Its similarity with the classical G-banding observed by LM makes it easy to interpret and facilitates karyotyping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it