The effect of intra-gastric acidity and flora on the concentration of N-nitroso compounds in the stomach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Correa's hypothesis proposes that gastric carcinogenesis is due to atrophic gastritis and hypochlorhydria which permit gastric bacterial colonization, the reduction of dietary nitrates to nitrites and the formation of potentially carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds (NOCs). OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that omeprazole-induced hypochlorhydria is associated with increased intra-gastric concentrations of nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB), nitrites and NOCs. DESIGN: Single-blind study in healthy volunteers. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen healthy subjects (seven female, mean age 24 years), free of Helicobacter pylori infection, received a one-week course of placebo followed by a two-week course of omeprazole, 20 mg daily. METHODS: Fasted gastric samples, aspirated using a sterile double-lumen nasogastric tube at the end of the 1 st week (placebo) and the 2nd and 3rd weeks (omeprazole), were cultured aerobically and anaerobically; gastric pH and intra-gastric concentrations of nitrates, nitrites and NOCs were also determined. RESULTS: After weeks 1, 2 and 3, the intra-gastric concentrations of nitrate-reducing bacteria exceeded 10(5) colony-forming units (c.f.u.)/ml in 3, 7 and 9 subjects, respectively (P > 0.05). A gastric pH greater than 4.0 was associated with increased NRB (P < 0.05); however, neither increased gastric pH nor increased NRB, alone or in combination, was associated with increased intra-gastric concentrations of nitrites or NOCs (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A two-week increase in gastric pH in healthy, H. pylori-negative subjects was associated with increased intra-gastric concentrations of nitrate-reducing bacteria but not of nitrites or N-nitroso compounds. These data suggest that reduced gastric acid secretion is not a necessary precursor to the formation of carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds and that other mechanisms should be invoked to explain gastric carcinogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".