MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047208965 · doi:10.1080/07317131.2015.998464

Education for Technical Services Librarians: Courses Taught at Accredited Library and Information Science Degree Programs

2015· article· en· W2047208965 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Barbara Albee

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnical Services Quarterly · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Information Literacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccreditationSyllabusCurriculumLibrary scienceCatalogingCollection developmentMedical educationSubject (documents)Information sciencePolitical scienceComputer scienceSociologyPedagogyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Library science education is explored through an investigation of program websites, an instructor survey, and review of course syllabi. The purpose of this study was to acquire a representation of technical services education offered through ALA accredited programs in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. This study reviewed program websites for courses associated with technical services responsibilities, such as cataloging, acquisitions, serials, collection management, preservation, and systems. A survey was sent to library and information science instructors to closely investigate institution curricula and the prevalence of technical services courses, their means of delivery, subject coverage, and faculty member status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.129
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnical Services QuarterlySame topicLibrary Science and Information LiteracyFrench-language works237,207