MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047276060 · doi:10.3138/cjh.49.1.1

Paul-Henri Spaak, héraut ou soliste du socialisme belge ?

2014· article· fr· W2047276060 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fabien Conord

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical sciencePhilosophyEthnologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paul-Henri Spaak (1899-1972) est l’un des principaux hommes politiques de la Belgique au XXe siècle. Il fut Premier ministre à trois reprises (1938-1939, 1946 et 1947-1949) mais aussi président de plusieurs instances européennes et secrétaire général de l’OTAN. Sa carrière militante commence, de manière éphémère, dans les rangs libéraux et s’achève dans la mouvance francophone mais demeure surtout liée, de manière fort complexe, au socialisme belge pendant presque un demisiècle. Premier chef de gouvernement socialiste de son pays, Paul-Henri Spaak est tour à tour un militant contestataire et un leader controversé. C’est cette relation complexe avec sa formation politique que décrypte cet article. Il restitue les moments de symbiose (planisme, débuts de la Guerre froide et construction européenne) et les éléments de divergence (atlantisme, reconnaissance de l’Espagne franquiste, querelle linguistique) entre Paul-Henri Spaak et le parti socialiste de Belgique, et illustre ainsi la forte autonomie dont il a toujours fait preuve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HistorySame topicHistorical Geopolitical and Social DynamicsFrench-language works237,207