Physicochemical Studies on Microemulsions. 7. Dynamics of Percolation and Energetics of Clustering in Water/AOT/Isooctane and Water/AOT/Decane w/o Microemulsions in Presence of Hydrotopes (Sodium Salicylate, α-Naphthol, β-Naphthol, Resorcinol, Catechol, Hydroquinone, Pyrogallol and Urea) and Bile Salt (Sodium Cholate)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The temperature induced percolation of w/o microemulsions (water/AOT/isooctane and water/AOT/decane) has been studied at different [water]/[AOT] mole ratios (ω), and in the presence of hydrotopes (sodium salicylate, α-naphthol, β-naphthol, resorcinol, catechol, hydroquinone, pyrogallol, urea) and the bile salt sodium cholate. The results have been analyzed to quantify the threshold percolation temperature, performance of the Scaling equation, the activation energy for the percolation process, and the thermodynamics of the clustering of the dispersed nanodroplets. The influence of temperature and additives on the droplet dimension, the polydispersity, and the diffusion coefficient has been also investigated by the DLS studies. An attempt has been made to correlate the results with the differential activities of the hydrotopes. A possible mechanism of the varied activities of the hydrotopes is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".