Using a Phage Display Library to Identify Basic Residues in A-Raf Required to Mediate Binding to the Src Homology 2 Domains of the p85 Subunit of Phosphatidylinositol 3′-Kinase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Src homology 2 (SH2) domains are found in a variety of cytoplasmic proteins involved in mediating signals from cell surface receptors to various intracellular pathways. They fold as modular units and are capable of recognizing and binding to short linear peptide sequences containing a phosphorylated tyrosine residue. Here we show that each of the SH2 domains of the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase selects phage displayed peptide sequences containing the core (L/I)-A-(R/K)-I-R. The serine/threonine kinase A-Raf, containing the sequence LQRIRS, is associated with the p85 protein in both quiescent and growth factor stimulated cells. This suggests that p85 and A-Raf exist in a protein complex in cells and that complex formation does not require growth factor stimulation. We also show that p85 and A-Raf can bind directly to each other in vitro and that this interaction is mediated in part by the p85 SH2 domains. Further, the p85 SH2 domains require at least one of four distinct basic-X-basic sequence motifs within A-Raf for binding. This is the first description of a phosphotyrosine-independent SH2 domain interaction that requires basic residues on the SH2 ligand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".