MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047364528 · doi:10.1353/can.0.0189

Clandestine Operations: The Vancouver Women’s Caucus, the Abortion Caravan, and the RCMP

2009· article· en· W2047364528 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Christabelle Sethna, Steve Hewitt

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Political and Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbortionCaucusLawSustenanceGender studiesCriminologySociologyPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1969, the reform of the Criminal Code legalized contraception, abortion, and homosexual acts between consenting adults. Yet the conditions under which legal abortion was now permissible were so restrictive that the new abortion law provoked widespread discontent. One women’s liberation group, the fledging Vancouver Women’s Caucus (VWC), outlined a plan to travel to Ottawa between February and May 1970 in an Abortion Caravan to protest the new law. The caravan’s central feature was a van bearing a coffin filled with coat hangers to represent the deaths of women from botched abortions. Declassified RCMP files reveal that the Mounties were spying on the VWC and tracking the Abortion Caravan on its journey from Vancouver to Ottawa. An analysis of these files shows that the VWC, like other women’s liberation groups, was targeted for surveillance because the RCMP was extremely concerned about women’s liberation groups’ real and putative connections to left-wing organizations. Indeed, the RCMP’s approach to women’s liberation groups was a crucial component of the climate of fear of subversion so prevalent during the Cold War. However, the files also reveal that RCMP surveillance of the VWC proved to be a major challenge because of the complex gendered nature of the force’s surveillance of women’s liberation groups. Ultimately, the files point to the importance of studying the ways in which state security interests intersect with variables such as gender, class, race, and sexual orientation. La réforme du Code criminel de 1969 légalise la contraception, l’avortement et les rapports homosexuels entre adultes consentants. Toutefois, les nombreuses restrictions légales qui continuent d’encadrer l’avortement provoquent beaucoup de mécontentement. Un groupe pour la libération des femmes, l’embryonnaire Vancouver Women’s Caucus (VWC), décide d’organiser, de février à mai 1970, une « Caravane de l’avortement », voyage de protestation à destination de la capitale. Des dossiers déclassifiés de la GRC révèlent que la police fédérale a espionné le VWC et la Caravane de l’avortement le long de son trajet entre Vancouver et Ottawa. Ils montrent que la GRC a ciblé le VWC, tout comme d’autres groupes du Mouvement de libération des femmes (MLF), à cause de ses liens réels et supposés avec les organisations de gauche. De fait, l’attitude de la GRC envers les groupes pour la libération des femmes a contribué de façon significative à la phobie de la subversion qui a marqué les années de guerre froide. Les dossiers montrent aussi que la surveillance des groupes du MLF, à cause de sa dimension genrée, représentait un défi complexe pour la Gendarmerie royale. En fin de compte, ces dossiers de la GRC soulignent l’importance d’étudier les intérêts de sécurité de l’État à travers les variables du genre, de la classe, de la race et de l’orientation sexuelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0220.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicAmerican Political and Social DynamicsFrench-language works237,207