Endoproteolytic processing of the mammalian prion glycoprotein family
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) misfolds to form infectivity-associated scrapie prion protein and generates C-terminal fragments C1 and C2 in healthy and prion-infected animals. C1 cleavage occurs N-terminally of PrP(C)'s hydrophobic domain, whereas the larger C2 fragment is generated by cleavage at the end of the octarepeat region. As the PrP-like proteins Doppel and Shadoo (Sho) have been reported to inhabit similar membrane environments as PrP(C), we investigated endoproteolysis by using a panel of mutant alleles. Doppel undergoes efficient in vivo cleavage at a C1 site mapped to the start of the globular domain, which is a structurally similar cleavage site to that in PrP(C). Sho is processed to C1 and C2 fragments, and proved refractory to mutagenesis to inactivate C1 cleavage. As a reciprocal product of C1 cleavage, Sho also engenders a metabolically stable N1 fragment with a C-terminus after its hydrophobic domain, an observation that may account for N1's association with membrane and/or cellular fractions in vitro and in vivo. Our data indicate that glycosylation status and yet to be identified proteases modulate internal C1 and C2 proteolysis events within the mammalian prion protein family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".