MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047382687 · doi:10.5194/ms-4-333-2013

Experimental investigation of water droplets' behavior in dielectric medium: the effect of an applied D.C. electric field

2013· article· en· W2047382687 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanical sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsCoalescence (physics)Electric fieldMaterials scienceMechanicsVoltageDielectricPerpendicularElectrodeLiquid dielectricCondensed matter physicsComposite materialElectrical engineeringChemistryPhysicsOptoelectronicsEngineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. In this article, the behavior of water droplets which are suspended in silicon oil is qualitatively investigated and some phenomena such as liquid's burst are reported. The movement of droplet in perpendicular line is considered while many studies have considered small droplets fluctuating between two horizontal electrodes. Additionally any deformation caused by increasing voltage was observed from start to finish until short contact occurred. As can be seen two oppositely charged drops contacting each other do not necessarily result in coalescence. Repelling can be expected occasionally. By increasing the voltage, the droplets, which spread through the domain due to frequent breakups, tend to gather in a certain line.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it