MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Durability of Fiberglass Composite Sheet Piles in Water

2002· article· en· W2047389610 on OpenAlexafffund
Yixin Shao, Serge Kouadio

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Composites for Construction · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialAbsorption of waterUltimate tensile strengthComposite numberSaturation (graph theory)PultrusionYoung's modulusDurabilityFick's laws of diffusionDiffusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The durability of fiberglass composite sheet piles in water was studied through the specimens cut from flanges and webs of pultruded sheet pile sections. The experiments were performed to evaluate the water absorption at ambient temperature in complete immersion, and its effect on the tensile properties and the freeze-thaw resistance of the saturated composites. The high temperature at 70°C was used to accelerate the tests, and 100°C (boiling water) to verify the state of saturation. The non-Fickian absorption behavior of the pultruded composites was modeled based on the Berens and Hopfenberg two-phase absorption theory to predict the long-term performance and the change in mechanical properties of saturated composites. The results indicated that the water absorption process of the pultruded sheet pile composites followed a combination of Fickian diffusion and polymeric relaxation. The percent absorption at saturation was about 1.72% for the flange and 3.11% for the web. The water absorption model predicted that saturation would be reached after 5.8 years for the flange and after 14.5 years for the web immersed in tap water at ambient temperature. The tensile strength was found to decrease initially with the increase in the percent water absorption, and finally stabilize at the state of saturation. On the other hand, there was no noticeable change in the tensile modulus of elasticity during the entire water-aging period. The saturated composites showed excellent resistance to freeze-thaw cycling from 4.4 to -17.8°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Composites for ConstructionSame topicMechanical Behavior of CompositesFrench-language works237,207