Synthesis and Characterization of a New Family of Spin Bearing TTF Ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The syntheses and characterization of two new tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) derivatives bearing pyridine-based substituents and 1,5'-dimethyl-6-oxoverdazyl radicals are described. The TTF-pyridine and bipyridine aldehydes were prepared via a palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction between mono(tributylstannyl)tetrathiafulvalene (3) and the appropriate formylpyridyl halides (4). The radical precursors, the corresponding 1,2,4,5-tetrazanes, were prepared by condensation of the bis(1-methylhydrazide) of carbonic acid with the TTF bearing pyridyl aldehyde. Oxidation of tetrazanes 8 and 9 with 1,4-benzoquinone afforded the donor radicals 1 and 2 as 1:1 complexes with hydroquinone. Both complexes are stable in the solid state and their electronic properties have been characterized by EPR, cyclic voltammetry, and UV/vis spectroscopy. The TTF core of both compounds was oxidized both chemically and electrochemically to afford the corresponding cation diradical species. The electronic properties of both donor radicals have been probed by cyclic voltammetry, UV-vis spectroscopy, and preliminary EPR measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".