Abstract 3285: Functional analysis of the 9p22 locus implicates the transcriptional regulation of <i>BNC2</i> as a mechanism in ovarian cancer predisposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An ovarian cancer Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) identified 9p22.2 as a novel susceptibility locus with the most statistically significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in an intergenic region near the Basonuclin 2 (BNC2) gene, which codes for a putative transcription regulator containing three pairs of zinc finger (ZF) domains. The minor alleles are protective in terms of ovarian cancer susceptibility. However, the molecular mechanisms by which these SNPs modify susceptibility remain largely unknown. The significant SNPs in the 9p22.2 locus lie in non-coding regions and therefore are hypothesized to affect the activity of regulatory elements and modify the expression of a target gene(s). In order to test this hypothesis we conducted fine mapping for the locus which delimited a ∼74kb region containing SNPs with a p-value less than 10-8. FAIRE-Seq and ChIP-Seq experiments for histone markers conducted in immortalized ovarian surface epithelial cells (IOSE) and fallopian tube epithelial cells (IFTE) were used to prioritize functional SNP candidates which overlap with regulatory elements. Luciferase assays tested the ability of these regulatory elements to activate transcription. Chromosome conformation capture (3C) experiments demonstrate a physical interaction between the BNC2 promoter and candidate regulatory elements containing risk-associated SNPs. Methylation Quantification at Trait Loci (mQTL) revealed an association between decreased methylation at the BNC2 promoter and the protective minor alleles. Expression analysis shows decreased expression of BNC2 in cancer versus normal tissue implicating tumor suppressor function of BNC2. Therefore the protective minor allele likely increases expression of BNC2 which in turn contains tumor suppressing properties that decrease ovarian cancer risk. BNC2 protein is in complex with transcriptional regulatory proteins, in particular the NURD complex components. Moreover, BNC2 acts as a transcriptional repressor in in vitro transfection assays indicating that it functions in transcriptional repression. We then used protein binding microarrays and CHIP-Seq experiments to identify its putative DNA binding motifs and its downstream target genes. Analysis of this data suggests that BNC2 functions in a regulatory transcription network that impacts on genes implicated in ovarian cancer with enrichment for genes in the TGF-beta response pathway. Citation Format: Melissa A. Buckley, Howard C. Shen, Gustavo A. Mendoza-Fandino, Nicholas T. Woods, Anxhela Gjyshi, Juliet French, Kate Lawrenson, Honglin Song, Jonathan Tyrer, Renato S. Carvalho, Alexandra Valle, Ann Chen, Sean Yoder, Gregory Bloom, Ya-Yu Tsai, Ally Yang, Timothy R. Hughes, Xiaotao Qu, Mine Cicek, Melissa Larson, Ellen Goode, Brooke Fridley, Susan Ramus, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Paul Pharoah, Thomas A. Sellers, Simon Gayther, Alvaro N.A. Monteiro, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Functional analysis of the 9p22 locus implicates the transcriptional regulation of BNC2 as a mechanism in ovarian cancer predisposition. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 3285. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-3285
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".