MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047468792 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-319-3_14

The Legacies of Liberalism and Oppressive Relations: Facing a Dilemma for the Subject of Moral Education

2015· book-chapter· en· W2047468792 on OpenAlexaff
Dwight Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral developmentSubject (documents)DilemmaPresentation (obstetrics)Moral educationSociologyLiberalismMoral dilemmaMoral developmentPedagogyPolitical scienceLawEpistemologyPsychologySocial psychologyPhilosophyMedicineLibrary sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper was written for presentation as the annual Kohlberg Memorial Lecture for the Association for Moral Education (AME). The AME is an interdisciplinary, international organization founded at Harvard in 1976 for the purpose of sharing academic and practical perspectives on moral education. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.047
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207