Electron spin polarization of the excited quartet state of strongly coupled triplet–doublet spin systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electron spin polarization associated with electronic relaxation in molecules with trip-quartet and trip-doublet excited states is calculated. Such molecules typically relax to the lowest trip-quartet state via intersystem crossing from the trip doublet, and it is shown that when spin-orbit coupling provides the main mechanism for this relaxation pathway it leads to spin polarization of the trip quartet. Analytical expressions for this polarization are derived using first- and second-order perturbation theory and are used to calculate powder spectra for typical sets of magnetic parameters. It is shown that both net and multiplet contributions to the polarization occur and that these can be separated in the spectrum as a result of the different orientation dependences of the +/-1/2<-->+/-3/2 and +1/2<-->-1/2 transitions. The net polarization is found to be localized primarily in the center of the spectrum, while the multiplet contribution dominates in the outer wings. Despite the fact that the multiplet polarization is much stronger than the net polarization for individual orientations of the spin system, the difference in orientation dependence of the transitions leads to comparable amplitudes for the two contributions in the powder spectrum. The influence of this difference on the line shape is investigated in simulations of partially ordered samples. Because the initial nonpolarized state of the spin system is not conserved for the proposed mechanism, the net polarization can survive in the doublet ground state following electronic relaxation of the triplet part of the system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".