MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047510550 · doi:10.1049/iet-map.2013.0115

Mechanically reconfigurable antennas using an anisotropic carbon‐fibre composite ground

2013· article· en· W2047510550 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversité du Québec à MontréalInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComposite numberMaterials scienceAnisotropyComposite materialCarbon fibersElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsOpticsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors present reconfigurable antennas based on anisotropic reinforced continuous carbon fibre composite (RCCFC) material. By the rotation of the anisotropic RCCFC ground plane, the current distribution can be changed to select a desirable mode of resonance and suppress unwanted modes. Hence, the RCCFC ground plane behaves as a mode filter in the proposed reconfigurable antennas. Several types of probe‐fed reconfigurable microstrip‐patch antennas are presented, including the RCCFC conductivity characteristics, the principle of reconfigurable operation and the simulated and measured performance. The outstanding mechanical strength of RCCFC materials along with the promising radiation characteristics of these reconfigurable antennas make them good candidates for radio cognitive and military applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it