MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fading Statistics for the Joint Fading and Two Path Shadowing Channel

2014· article· en· W2047516065 on OpenAlexaff
Indrakshi Dey, Geoffrey G. Messier, Sebastian Magierowski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingFading distributionChannel state informationShadow mappingJoint (building)Log-distance path loss modelLevel crossingStatisticsPath lossMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceTelecommunicationsRayleigh fadingWirelessArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New expressions for the joint moments, mean, variance and amount of fading (AF) of the Joint Fading and Two-path Shadowing (JFTS) distribution are derived in this letter. The derived expressions for theoretical mean and variance are shown to agree with the experimental results. The AF expression is used for comparing the severity of fading imparted by the JFTS distribution to the fading severity of other common small scale fading and composite fading / shadowing distributions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207